[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] New (19.10.05) MS-IE Url Spoofing bug (byK-Gen)
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] New (19.10.05) MS-IE Url Spoofing bug (byK-Gen)
- From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:15:30 +1300
Jake Cole to me:
> In "Billy's" defense, this is expected in most
> JavaScript-enabled browsers.
"expected" and "most" don't quite tie up. Is it "expected" or not?
Are theer javascript-enabled browsers where it doesn't work? If so, in
what truly meaningful sense is this "expected" behaviour? (See another
recent post where I explain what happens in Mozilla 1.0.7 on my
machine...)
> Here's a Firefox version:
<<snip>>
Hmmmm -- a "Firefox version"??
Suggests that it is not quite entirely "expected", eh?
More that it is a corner case, or perhaps, even -- gasp -- undefined,
no??
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/