[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
- To: Eric Lauzon <eric.lauzon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Cisco IOS Shellcode Presentation
- From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:02:59 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Eric Lauzon wrote:
:
:So mutch fuss....its all so new ..
:
:
:http://www.phrack.org/phrack/56/p56-0x0a
:
:
:-elz
I don't get your point; it obviously seems you're trying to be sarcastic.
I think, if you realize what you're talking about, the point of the talk
was the idea of reliably being able to exploit a IOS vulnerability.
Reliably meaning having the cisco box not reboot on you (or other various
scenarios that could occur).
Gaius has some good information there, but there's a difference between
being on a router and plugging in backdoor code and actually being able to
get onto the router via an exploit.
So what was the key point? CHECK HEAPS -- the idle proc that kicks in to
validate heap management structures. Think about malloc() bugs (double
free()'s and stuff) that were talked about a few years back... Those were
easier to exploit b/c they didn't have a check heaps code that kicks in...
If you don't understand the last paragraph, then, please stop trying to
post technical arguments on this subject.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew R. Reiter
arr@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/