[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Publishing exploit code - what is it good for
- To: Joachim Schipper <j.schipper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Publishing exploit code - what is it good for
- From: Erick Mechler <emechler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:36:57 -0700
:: Blackhats may get along with only a handful of exploits, if they're
:: willing to try to find targets to match their collection, but a
:: pentester should have the collection to match the target.
::
:: This is doubly true if we're not talking about a dedicated pentester,
:: but about a sysadmin with a networking/security background who likes to
:: verify that the patches did, indeed, work.
To that I say let the people producing the patches deliver the exploit code
as a POC that the patches did, indeed, work. Releasing exploit code before
the patch is released helps nobody except the blackhats.
:: Also, exploits will be distributed, publicly or otherwise - doing it in
:: the open means we know what happens when.
You should, as an admin, assume that once a vulnerability is released, the
exploit has been too, whether you see it attached to the vuln announcement
or not.
Cheers - Erick
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/