[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Jack Szeszycki



On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:29 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:00:40 +0930, Jack_Szeszycki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> >>I will respond to your email when I return.
> > If, of course, the e-mail is still there when Jack returns. ;)
> 
> Does this form a binding contract?

At least his didn't include a "this is privileged info and you may not 
distribute
it further" clause that tries to form a binding contract.  I wish it had, I'd 
love
to chase after them to invoice them for the costs of taking down our mailserver
to make sure the message is *really* gone.  Oh, and we'd have to do up new 
backup
tapes.  LTO-2s are *expensive*, and when you're doing several million messages a
day, you go through a lot of them.  Especially fun on a Monday, when we may need
to clean up 3 day's worth of tapes... ;)

Attachment: pgp43J5ixIqlF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/