[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON stack overflow
- To: <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON stack overflow
- From: <nolimit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:55:33 -0400
Ah, you refer to this one.
"The first vulnerability specifically exists in the handling of a long
username to the LOGIN command. A long username argument of approximately
2,000 bytes will cause a stack based unicode string buffer overflow
providing the attacker with partial control over EIP. As this
vulnerability is in the LOGIN command itself, valid credentials are not
required. "
Later it reads
"The second vulnerability also exists in the handling of the LOGIN
command username argument, however it lends itself to easier
exploitation."
I guess I shouldn't have trusted this statement :)
Perhaps I'll take a look at this one next, or just use your CANVAS example :)
Cheers
nolimit
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/