On Sun, 15 May 2005 20:33:06 CDT, "Stejerean, Cosmin" said: > regular patching. There might be some cases when writing a quick "worm" to > patch rogue machines automatically might be better (especially to patch > laptops connected to a wireless hotspot, etc) but since it is risky it Nope.. You don't *know* that a worm will or won't actually hit that vulnerable laptop. It *probably* will, given enough time. Or you can just have an attack-trained DHCP server, and *know* that laptop will get fixed when it rears its head on the network. ;)
Attachment:
pgpt3VIQVJeCt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/