Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms

[Benjamin Franz <snowhare@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 13 May 2005, Eric Paynter wrote:

> On Fri, May 13, 2005 9:59 am, Michael Holstein said:
> > > 3. If not, what prevents you from doing that?
> > Any worm/virus, regardless of intent, is still illegal -- and I don't
> > think I can get a DSL line in jail.
>
> Not true. Intent is *everything* as far a criminal activity is concerned.

Don't quit your day job to work as a lawyer. There are a many laws that 
turn on facts rather than intent.

  "Lack of criminal intent does not shield a citizen from the BATF. In 
United States v. Thomas, the defendant found a 16- inch-long gun while 
horseback riding. Taking it to be an antique pistol, he pawned it. But it 
turned out to be short-barreled rifle, which should have been registered 
before selling. Although the prosecutor conceded that Thomas lacked 
criminal intent, he was convicted of a felony anyway.[64] The Supreme 
Court's decision in United States v. Freed declared that criminal intent 
was not necessary for a conviction of violation of the Gun Control Act of 
1968.[65]"
      David Kopel, in "Trust The People: The Case Against Gun Control"

Note: This is not intended to bring gun control into the argument, it was 
simply the first clear example I found of a conviction for a crime without 
intent.

--
Benjamin Franz

Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
                                         - Alan Kay

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/