[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Remote Compromise Leaked
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Remote Compromise Leaked
- From: Vincent van Scherpenseel <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:02:24 +0200
On Sunday 08 May 2005 10:14, Jason Coombs wrote:
> Nothing at all would have been gained by delaying disclosure, other than
> to give attackers a bigger window of opportunity to mount successful
> attacks and design new exploits that will launch successfully against a
> completely unprepared computing public.
Most of the time disclosure is delayed to allow the vendor to fix a security
bug. If you find a security bug and give the vendor five days to fix it
before you release the disclosure advisory there's a smaller chance that the
vulnerability will be exploited by malicious people.
Full disclosure works because it forces vendors to actually fix a security
problem, and delaying a disclosure for a couple of days doesn't hurt that way
of working.
- Vincent van Scherpenseel
--
http://vincent.vanscherpenseel.nl/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/