[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Micky-dee's anyone?
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Micky-dee's anyone?
- From: n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 19:56:40 +0100
On 5/1/05, James Tucker <jftucker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Er, Bank, McD's. The monetary values are not entirely dissimilar.
>
> XSS is XSS anyway, does it really matter where? Black hats are known
> for their exploitation of "underestimated" weaknesses, so if one were
> feeling philosophical, it could be expressed that this problem may be
> more important than the 'bigger' issues.
You can't pick a better day than May the 1st to disclose a XSS
vulnerability on a Mc Donands website than on May the 1st, and thats
the point in this whole little affair.
Thanks, n3td3v
This is where I read Full-Disclosure:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/n3td3v
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/