[Full-Disclosure] Phrack is dead, long live Phrack!

[starwars <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

After several years of steady decline in the wrong hands, maybe it is too late 
to save Phrack. But I think we owe something back to the zine that gave us so 
much. Many us were drawn into computer security by Phrack, grew up along with 
it, and were nourished by the high quality papers of it's contributors.

The current editors of Phrack have decided to kill off Phrack for good. This is 
an outrage. Phrack has always purported to be for the community by the 
community. They have no right to kill off nearly twenty years of tradition.

Despite it's poor performance of late, Phrack still has
an unparalleled and awesome record as a technical source you can really
bite your teeth into. It's also had a major cultural impact over the
years:

"You bet your ass we're all alike... we've been spoon-fed baby food at
school when we hungered for steak... the bits of meat that you did let
slip through were pre-chewed and tasteless. We've been dominated by
sadists, or ignored by the apathetic. The few that had something to
teach found us willing pupils, but those few are like drops of water
in the desert.
...
Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that of 
judging people by what they say and think, not what they look like. My crime is 
that of outsmarting you, something that you will never forgive me for.
"

-- A hacker's manifesto, the Mentor, 1986

The current "anonymous" batch editors have outgrown the zine. They were a bad 
choice to begin with, but regardless, that's happened to phrack before. On a 
regular basis. Every generation or so passes on phrack to the next. It's 
tradition.

What's different about the current batch of editors was their intense arrogance 
and unusualy patronizing attitude towards the scene. Phrack hasn't been about 
the computer underground for years. The last ten years have turned Phrack into 
a prestigious journal for security research. 

The anarchistic underground roots of phrack have been whitewashed away by the 
latest batch of editors. Go and read the issues from 1980s, early 90s.

The reason this happened was that when the scene moved to the Internet in the 
mid 90s the MIT hacker memes battled it out against "war games" hacker meme of 
the 80s. Hacker still has an 80s meaning for the general public, but the MIT 
hacker meme clearly won amongst the technically savy. The "cracker" and "script 
kiddy" memes were part of a process that turned Phrack's underground past into 
an embarrassment.

So Phrack gradually turned against it's own roots.  It's not for the hacker 
community by the hacker community anymore. Far from it. The current incarnation 
of Phrack actually spreads hypocritical anti-hacker memes between it's covers. 
It's BY $150-an-hour-security-consultants FOR 
our-reputation-in-the-security-industry.

Phrack has been hijacked by sellouts.

Aside from their snobbish elitist attitude, what have the recent editors of 
Phrack contributed? The articles are written by others. Try reading the 
"loopback" section written by the Phrack editors sometime. Degrading newbies 
never gets old for these guys. Ha ha! you're all so stupid! We're so uber elite!

So now what's happened is that these guys are so old school, so 
been-there-done-that, patronizing assholes that they've decided it's time for 
Phrack to die rather than evolve.

Here's an alternative to killing off a 20 year tradition: run a competition 
amongst would-be editors who can publish the best next issue of phrack. Then 
allow the PUBLIC to vote amongst alternatives as to whom succeeds the current 
editors.

The team that manages to hack together the best edition of phrack 64 wins.

Phrack is dead. Long live phrack!

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html