Re: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall

[John <naverxp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah. Sorry for the huge mistake, i was thinking since it does reject/block packets, so it actually does a big component of what Firewall is for (correct me if i'm wrong). 

According to their website its, 

PacketShaper is just one component of Packeteer's application traffic
management system. This system is delivered in a single appliance with
multiple software options that provide:

Thanks. Are there anymore solutions apart from snort with pf on openbsd?




Debasis Mohanty wrote:

> PacketShaper is a Firewall; well I didn't know that... :P
>
> FYI: It is a network traffic management product (maybe somewhat more than
> that but now a Firewall)
>
>
> Regards, 
> Debasis Mohanty
> www.hackingspirits.com 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 11:31 AM
> To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Packet/Signature-based Firewall
>
> Hi
>
> I was wondering are there any Budget/OpenSource signature-based firewall
> around like the one Packeteer has? (packetshaper)
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>
>
>
>  


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html