On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:22:28 CST, Ron DuFresne said: > of course, on a semi serious note, elctromagnectic imaging scans have > proven to be pretty effective in noting the difference in a lying brain > and a truthful one. Now if they can just consolidate all that equipment > into a small handable wand kinda device... What we *really* need is a portable cluon-flux detector, so that we can wave it past somebody and tell if they're a net emitter of cluons, or a cluon sink, or a null-cluon. Interestingly enough, it can be shown that cluon sinks are preferable to null-cluons - sinks will absorb cluons and accumulate them, eventually becoming cluon emitters once they reach a critical mass of cluons. Null cluons react with cluons in about the same way as neutrinos react with normal matter - they very rarely hit-and-stick. OB-Full-Disclosure: The effect on your organization's overall security stance when a null-cluon gets appointed into management.
Attachment:
pgp00097.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html