[Full-Disclosure] Re: ndisasm bad opcodes interpretation

["Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"shadown" <shadown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d8360fbf0501070830475ef080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>
> i.e:
> 0000001C 7565 jnz 0x83
> sould had been jnz 0x65

  No it shouldn't. Engage brain before opening mouth:  what is 0x65 + 0x1e
(== address of byte immediately after the instruction in question)?  Google
"pc-relative branch displacement" for more.  Or learn some assembler
programming before trying to use a disassembler.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html