[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] MediaSentry false positives?
- To: Kevin <kkadow@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MediaSentry false positives?
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:00:41 +0100
> Has anybody received "Notice of claimed infringement" from MediaSentry
> for IP addresses which, while registered to you or your organization,
> are in a range not actively in use?
I've independently received another report of this problem.
> I see two likely possibilities -- either MediaSentry is not using due
> diligence in verifying that the material for which they send
> infringement notices is actually shared from the address they show in
> the complaint, or somebody on the Internet is spoofing BGP route
> announcements for unused address space out of larger allocations.
RIPE doesn't have an announcement of the prefix, so I think
MediaSentry was in error.
I don't think it makes sense for MediaSentry to check their findings
more closely from a business perspective. They don't try to download
the infringing material to confirm that redistribution actually takes
place, either.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html