[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] DJB's contest (repost after being moderated on BGTQ)
- To: <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] DJB's contest (repost after being moderated on BGTQ)
- From: <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 08:31:25 -0800
Hey all, DJB,
>> Is the class on responsible disclosure next semester perhaps?
Responsible disclosure is a euphemism creating by industry lobby groups
like OIS, which never had much support in the security scene in the first
place.
> The reason that the 16 students sent their 91 reports to me privately is
> so that they wouldn't have to deal with people like you. It was entirely
> my decision to send out these 44 public notices.
If I am allowed to suggest something for a possible re-run of the same
course:
It would probably be more interesting to set a lower bar on the number of
vulnerabilities but to restrict the focus a bit more -- e.g. asking for 1
remotely
exploitable bug in a list of widely used software (Bind/OpenSSH/ProFTPd (or
even QMail :-)
would focus students on larger pieces of software that are a bit more
critical than
e.g. nasm. This would lead to the students searching for less "standardized"
problems,
as well.
Then again, it sounds like a really fun course :)
Cheers,
Thomas Dullien
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html