I have to aggree with Todd on this one, the attack was extremely unprofessional, and things like this should be left out of mailing lists. I could carry on, but am forcing myself not to here. xyberpix On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 08:38 -0600, Todd Towles wrote: > Umm..and you were the one giving cheers to Norton. Of course AV can be > fooled..and of course a patch from microsoft is the only true way to > fix the problem. > > She was attacking you for giving Cheers to Norton. I didn't release > the POC, you did. I am happy Norton is detecting it. If you want to > change your words right in the middle of the sentence, I really don't > care. > > By attacking me on a personal level, you have proven to me..to be > unprofessional at best. > > > ______________________________________________________________ > From: Michael Evanchik [mailto:Mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 5:03 PM > To: Todd Towles; Elle Chicka; full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] And you're proud of this Mike > Evanchick? > > > Todd, > > Listen, you are so wrong i cant belive you even have the guts > to post this. How stupid can you be? Norton or any AVP can > easily be fooled. The active x object "ca"+n b"+ +e crea" > +ted" like this. code changed around , or even different local > code can be used and tada AVP is fooled. Only a true patch > from microsoft or disable the help control in the registry is > going to stop this. Her concern is wise. > > Mike > www.michaelevanchik.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Todd Towles > To: Elle Chicka ; full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:36 AM > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] And you're proud of > this Mike Evanchick? > > > Well, if you have Norton, it couldn't wreak > havoc...now could it? Most of the AV compaines are now > detecting the exploit. This detection response is much > faster than most of the other exploits which are > wreaking havoc on your network, so it would sound. > > Nice work to Norton. > > > ______________________________________________ > From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Elle Chicka > Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:16 PM > To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] And you're proud of > this Mike Evanchick? > > > You so proudly posted this: > ------------------------ > > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/trojan.phel.a.html > > mike > > www.michaelevanchik.com > > ------------------------ > Obviously you are just tickled to see that the > kiddies were able to so quickly turn your > point/click sploit code into a virus to wreak > havoc on my network. > > Thanks a lot for helping to make all of us a > little less secure over the holiday's. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- For Security and Open Source news and tips visit: http://www.xyberpix.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html