[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] A suggestion to all AV vendors...
- To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] A suggestion to all AV vendors...
- From: Kenneth Ng <kenneth.d.ng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:04:12 -0500
A few years ago when a big software vendor here to promote their
"cutting edge self healing" software, I quiped "I guess making
software that doesn't break was too hard for them". I got a lot of
angry stares that indicated that they were not amused.
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:43:50 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
<Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> It's still applying band-aids to a hemophiliac rather than supplying
> them with clotting factor. The only *sustainable* long-term solution is
> to use software that was designed with a sane security model, so there's
> no *need* for a separate A/V product.
>
> If you actually use a sane security model, not only do you vastly reduce the
> need for an A/V solution, but you also minimize the spyware and trojan issue.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html