Re: [Full-Disclosure] If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all start doing it?

["Gautam R. Singh" <gautam.singh@xxxxxxxxx>]

In my opinion the whole policy of being offensive retaliatory attacks
etc are too 'BUSH' , one should try all legal avenues 1st. Spammers
would eventually try to get back on you after u retaliate. and in this
crossfire of DoS & DDoSing 'innocent' user will be the one who get 
caught up in the middle. Strict policy & following on them legally
would give right signals . Ofcourse wen all this fails we can form a
joint coalition against spammers

now where does UN comes in?    

~ Gautam
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:45:05 +1100 (EST), Dave Horsfall
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Michael R. Schmidt wrote:
> 
> > Have you read the Geneva Convention? Or better yet "The United Nations
> > International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". Read it, the
> > whole thing, and then bitch and moan.  Do you really think Terrorists
> > live by it?
> 
> About as much as Amerika does...
> 
> > Article 7
> > No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
> > treatment or punishment.
> 
> Which pretty much says it all.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 


-- 
Gautam R. Singh
[mcp,ccna,cspfa,] t: +91 9848 525 074 | pgp:
http://gautam.techwhack.com/key/ | ymsgr: er-333 | msn: ro0_@hotmail

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html