[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
- To: nicolas vigier <boklm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
- From: Danny <nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:38:10 -0500
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:21:45 +0100, nicolas vigier
<boklm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are you really serious ? Is it a joke ?
Dude, I am seriously a naive idiot who just wanted to rant about the
people that abuse IRC. Hopefully this was just a momentary brain fart,
otherwise I might be in trouble, eh?
Often there is humour in such circumstances; I had a few laughs in the process.
Shit! Maybe I will meet my future wife on IRC! I would invite everyone from F-D.
> This remind me some stupid article I read on nytime :
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/06/technology/circuits/06chat.html
> (account required, if you don't have one try ptramo/ptramo)
What a stupid article. The author has it all wrong! IRC is a bed of
roses with Celine Dion playing in the background.
...D
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html