Fwd: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

[jo s <sybil1002@xxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Veditz <dveditz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
From: Daniel Veditz 
To: Paul Schmehl 

CC: Jason Coombs , full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In
Florida
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:30:55 -0800

Paul Schmehl wrote:
> 
> Even *if* they are correct (which is at least debateable) the 130,000 vote 
> discrepancy they argue for won't overcome Bush's lead of 380,000, so this 
> is, at best, an academic exercise.
                    *******************************************************

>If they are even possibly correct a discrepancy that large must be
>investigated to make sure it won't happen in a future election which might
>be a lot closer.
                 *********************************************************

I believe the real question here is IF the discrepancy was as great as 
purported then why would anybody assume that other discrepancy's don't exist in 
other states as well?  I'm constantly amazed at the naivete of the many 
individuals who place their trust in officials who've come to power through 
less than stellar means to begin with, and who are as crooked as three dollar 
bills and wouldn't hesitate to lie in order to further their gains in the first 
place.                       There was no election in america this year, it is 
as it was planned for during the course of the first 4 years that truly and 
without doubt, WERE stolen.   
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html




                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Meet the all-new My Yahoo! ? Try it today!