[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox
- To: "stephane nasdrovisky" <stephane.nasdrovisky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox
- From: "Stuart Fox (DSL AK)" <StuartF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:13:04 +1300
>Unfortunatly, ms group policy do not handle mac, solaris, linux, ...
>only ms toys can be configured using this. I also think it is somewhat
>new and will probably be old (why don't you use this miracle ms tool
>named: sorry, this falls under some nda) in a year or so.
It's not somewhat new - it's four years old, and the technology in use was in
use in NT 4 systems. It's the standard method of configuring Windows clients
that are members of an Active Directory - and will probably continue to be so.
A year or so won't even see the release of Longhorn, so it certainly won't be
"old".
>This mail doesn't mean firefox/mozilla is the greatest tool of the
>world. It lacks (or my knowledge is too limited) good ldap support (I
>tryed keeping my netscape config on my ldap directory, mozilla do not
>seems to have this feature).
So that's the answer to my question there: No.
>Other browsers&mail readers are using a
>dedicated central config server (I forgot the name) in order to make
>them more corporate aware.
People underestimate the importance of the browser being "corporate aware" -
being able to centrally control and configure the browser is important.