[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] question regarding CAN-2004-0930
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] question regarding CAN-2004-0930
- From: evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:17:02 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi,
don't know if this is the right place to ask, but here it goes:
i was notified by one of my users (!) about the recent samba vulnerability
(CAN-2004-0930 [1]) that this is indeed easily "exploitable" by just
issuing commands with long wildcard-patterns in the filename part, just as:
<smb-share>:\> dir ******.exe
ok, my smbd went crazy and the "dir" command was waiting for the result.
but: when i mounted the smb-share under linux (mount -t smbfs ....) and
issuing
$ ls /mnt/smb-share/*******.exe
"ls" returned *instantly* with "No such file or directory" and smbd did
not go crazy. now i ask myself: how comes?
thank you for comments,
Christian.
[1] http://samba.iasi.roedu.net/samba/security/CAN-2004-0930.html
- --
BOFH excuse #120:
we just switched to FDDI.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBmgveC/PVm5+NVoYRAkOFAJ9SdPk1yskCAwAId+wOfCY3n4rR0ACfVB3K
mObYXTZxboxpcLnV4vaov9Q=
=J3hN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html