Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

[Gregory Gilliss <ggilliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

OT. Don't want to hear it. Try Orkut or somewhere else.

G

On or about 2004.11.15 17:18:16 +0000, Florian Weimer (fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:

> > Sorry list, I just couldn't resist......
> >
> > *Electoral votes vs. Population [1]
> >
> > State    Population Votes  Votes / M pop.
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Alaska      648,818   3        4.624
> > Wyoming     501,242   3        5.985
> > Texas    22,118,509  34        1.537
> > ....
> >
> > I guess you must have missed that day in elementary 
> > school when they covered this.  Pretty simple huh???
> >
> > Are you happy that a Wyoming voter has 3.89 times the 
> > political power you do????
> 
> The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the
> senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most
> states.  This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit
> about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or
> the other simply has no net result.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

-- 
Gregory A. Gilliss, CISSP                              E-mail: greg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Computer Security                             WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/
PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html