[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked



--On Thursday, November 11, 2004 02:22:18 PM -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:

At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them

Do you know this for a fact? Can you identify the states/locations where this was implemented?

And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean *anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be unsupervised due to the design of the polling booth?

What does physical access to the polling booth gain a "hacker"? They would need physical access to the tabulator that counts the individual votes, would they not?

You're going to have to get more specific about what it is you think was possible.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html