[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: GWB.COM - Wassupwitdat?

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Eric Scher wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid1477906.1099082195306.JavaMail.ericscher@xxxxxxx"
 type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">Want to view <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="http://www.georgewbush.com";>www.georgewbush.com</a> from outside the US? 
You can't: Access
denied. This "security" measure (!?) can easily be avoided using a proxy in
the US or any anonymous surfing website though.

So, what is it he doesn't want anyone from outside the US to read ?
      </pre>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->


I don't want to ruin anyone's fun by throwing logic on this subject, but if I 
were a betting man; I'd say that the
Republican Party has decided they don't need to pay for bandwidth to serve 
non-voters.


Occam's Razor folks...  It still works.
  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
there are 600,000 americans living here in canada who are eligible to
vote in this election.&nbsp; how many of them are locked out of this site?&nbsp;
how about soldiers overseas?&nbsp; how many of them are deployed right 
now?&nbsp;
can they browse this site?&nbsp; how many vote-eligible americans are living
in another country or traveling right now?<br>
<br>
-d
</body>
</html>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html