[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [SPAM] Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Joke.cpl ???



We have had this talk on FD before...just search for AV Naming in the
archives....fun stuff. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Hugo van der Kooij
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:54 AM
> To: Full-Disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [SPAM] Fw: [Full-Disclosure] Joke.cpl ???
> 
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Daniel Bachfeld wrote:
> 
> > So far we have Bagle AQ, AT, AU, AY and BB for the same worm More 
> > proposals?
> >
> > This is the biggest divergence i've seen the last months. 
> Is there any 
> > reason, why the vendors could not agree on one name? We 
> already have 
> > CVE-entries and Bugtraq-IDs for vulnerabilities.
> 
> So far I noticed at least two distinct files which were 
> detected as W32/Bable.AP@mm (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AT (ClamAV).
> 
> Now I get freash trash Which is decoded as W32/Bagle.AQ@mm 
> (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AX (ClamAV).
> 
> I am under the impression it is not a single infection.
> 
> But I share your sense of utter confusion. To which the 
> people of ClamAV have contributed way too much. (Noticed 
> their 'SomeFool'series?)
> 
> Hugo.
> 
> -- 
>       I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
>       hvdkooij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                
> http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
>               Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
>               for they are subtle and quick to anger.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html