[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Advisory: Design flaw in human communication
- To: "Hugo van der Kooij" <hvdkooij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Advisory: Design flaw in human communication
- From: "Jason Coombs PivX Solutions" <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:10:20 +0000 GMT
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>I would like to point out a design
>flaw in human communication.
What you describe is an implementation bug, not a design flaw.
FD'ers in particular also appear to have a Reply To All defect whereby every
thought that enters one's head while reading FD is compulsively sent to the
entire list rather than to the individuals who may find the thoughts
interesting and relevant, despite those thoughts being off-topic.
OT posts would be valuable to the tone and context of any list provided that we
could patch every mail client to remove the Reply To All feature.
Shall we leave FD unmoderated with respect to any post that does not have 'Re:'
as the first three letters of its Subject line, but moderate all replies?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html