[Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: Any update on SSH brute force attempts?

[Dave Ewart <Dave.Ewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday, 18.10.2004 at 06:41 -0500, Ron DuFresne wrote:

> > > What are you doing/changing about your SSH configurations to
> > > reduce the possibility of these attacks finding any kind of hole
> > > in the OpenSSH software (that's what I run, so that's the only
> > > version I'm particularly concerned about) ?  Are you doing
> > > anything at all?
> >
> > Attacks on my system seemed to be restricted to root, so I set the
> > 'PermitRootLogin without-password' option, so that no root logins
> > using a password were possible - must be RSA key.  I also switched
> > to non-standard port.
> 
> Why not just disallow root logins directly, and force someone with a
> valid user account to su after getting a shell?  It was my impression
> that was more standard, and if one has to allow remote root directly,
> at least restrict it to specific systems and users.  All the places I
> have worked for forced the su after shell to root..

Well yes, that's fair enough - however, allowing direct root access does
make certain things more straightforward, automated use of 'scp' etc.

Dave.
- -- 
Dave Ewart
Dave.Ewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Research UK
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBc761bpQs/WlN43ARAv4hAKCPjpX99vCblwNdawitjNZdPTsF2ACgvA2P
ZV9EhkPzUbQ1gdIrVcxdEwo=
=UQg8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html