Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-Disclosure Posts

[Mike Barushok <mikehome@xxxxxxxxx>]

I wonder how they handled the Cisco guy whose actual
legal name was 'megazone' (Without the quotes, IIRC).

Or the chinese couple that wanted to name their kid '@'?
(The symbol ususally pronounced as 'at').


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, yahoo@localhost wrote:

> Should Full-Disclosure only allow so-called -real- names? I was on
> Nanog (a network admin list) and they have a rule where you can only
> post with a first and second name, instead of an alias or nick, to
> kind of give more credibility that you are a security professional and
> not a hax0r or script kiddie.
> 
> Should the same rule be pro actively implemented to Full-Disclosure or
> is it a dead duck idea?
> 
> I know hax0rs or script kiddies would probably use fake first and
> second names if it was implemented, but at least the list would look
> neat and a tad more professional?
> 
> Feedback welcomed....
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html