[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Full-Disclosure] Your daily internet traffic report
- From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:15:32 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, RandallM wrote:
> Router location index
> router1.iust.ac.ir Iran (Tehran) 29
>
> Which one of you are attacking Iran
> http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm
I am a bit puzzled. Why o they think that some random routers and ICMP
echo requests mak a good representation?
Most routers will regard any ICMP request to them as a low priority issue.
But there is no garantue that a drop of packets is an indication of the
router being busy. It could be dropped halfway and you will never know
why.
But the internet topology is much, much more complex. Doing ICMP echo
requests to 1 router and telling everyone what a country statistic is so
far besides the truth I will not call it a lie. (I hate to insult lies by
implying them in this.)
I have been on some provider location through out the Netherlands yet
there is only one (and a rather obscure one at that) router which should
represent the Netherlands.
Next thing they will show is graphs of pig airtraffic I guess.
Hugo.
--
I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
hvdkooij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html