[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] [OT] unarj dir-transversal bug (../../../..)
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] [OT] unarj dir-transversal bug (../../../..)
- From: evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:42:58 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Cedric Blancher wrote:
> There was a time when arj archiver was not available under Debian, for
> licensing/distribution problems, and only unarj package was available.
> As you can see, stable has only unarj 2.43 in non-free section :
ah! i *thought* it was in non-free once, but only checked the unstable
version where it's in main.
> Now, they have both arj and unarj 3.10.21, unarj being transitional for
> people to upgrade smoothly to old unarj 2 only package to full-featured
> arj 3 package when moving to upper distro. So expect unarj to disappear
makes sense, yes. thanks for clarification.
- --
BOFH excuse #225:
It's those computer people in X {city of world}. They keep stuffing
things up.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBa/uCC/PVm5+NVoYRAgqKAJ98WBZKE/YSZkFPY4QMkDSAvFNADgCePgHJ
aFpkN0WppFkUN52TaV22zS8=
=vAaS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html