Re: [Full-Disclosure] Hacking into private files, my credit card purchases, personal correspondence or anything that is mine is trespassing and criminal.

[Jesse Valentin <jessevalentin@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is an interesting perspective Harlan, but I cant say that I agree with 
you. The point I was trying to make was that there exists a need to change the 
inclinations of the mind and of the heart in order to make a difference. 
Behavior is just a bi product of this type of change. You can enforce laws, but 
sooner or later if the person?s mental or heartfelt inclination doesn?t change, 
then history has shown us that the result is rebellion.

 

Law enforcement, fear tactics, etc do not solve the underlying reasons for the 
problem, they just suppress them? sooner or later they resurface possibly under 
different forms, but still the same animal. 

 

Take stealing for example ? We know that stealing is obviously wrong and we 
have law enforcement to prevent this from happening, but?

 

How about using a digital de-scrambler for cable service? You?re getting 
something you?re not paying for? isn?t that stealing? True, its not a vital 
service, but isn?t this still plain ?ol stealing?

 

Same problem, different form. 

 

If you have to enforce a law for every form of stealing then you?re going to 
wind up with volumes and volumes of laws and a backed up judicial system to try 
oddball cases that are just the same ?ol problem rolled up into a different 
package? but oh wait.. isn?t that what happens today? J  

 

Thanks for the post.


Harlan Carvey <keydet89@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No
> matter how many laws are passed or how many policies
> are written, they are pretty much useless as they
> are not capable of changing people.

Laws don't change people's behaviour...the enforcement
of the laws does.

In the days of NIPC, the Attorney General mandated a
threshold of $5k losses when reporting cybercrimes in
order for the FBI to become involved. Did that change
behaviour? Yes, but not the behaviour we would
want...the crimes still occurred (or in some cases,
were thought to have occurred), yet the case load was
so overwhelming that unless you could demonstrate a
financial loss of $50K, they didn't even blink.

Having laws...words written on paper...is ineffective
in and of itself. Enforcing those laws, or at least
being able to do so, is what has an effect. Even if
you have enough trained, qualified LE personnel to
enforce the laws, you still have issues of...is the
"victim" capable of determining/demonstrating when a
crime has occurred?

=====
------------------------------------------
Harlan Carvey, CISSP
"Windows Forensics and Incident Recovery"
http://www.windows-ir.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/windowsir/

"Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for
you are crunchy, and good with ketchup."

"The simplicity of this game amuses me. 
Bring me your finest meats and cheeses."
------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com