[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] House approves spyware legislation
- To: "Eric Paynter" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] House approves spyware legislation
- From: "Jason Coombs PivX Solutions" <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 01:00:51 +0000 GMT
The only thing this anti-spyware legislation does is protect companies from
civil lawsuits for creating and deploying spyware or otherwise exceeding their
authorization to make changes to and access the computers of you and me.
Police are never going to hunt and kill the companies and people who are
responsible for spyware. The elements of the 'spyware' crime as defined by the
proposed legislation are by definition a civil dispute. It does not matter if a
bad site launches spyware when it is visited - because the act of visiting can
itself be permission to install spyware.
Java applets and other things already autoinstall without warning. You cannot
seriously believe that companies responsible for spyware will not point this
out in their own defense.
Read the legislation. It is a sham that is blatantly designed to protect bad
companies from financial ruin for the harm they are causing to people.
... Just another terrible abuse of people's ignorance of complex technical
subject matter like spyware and complex, highly-evolved, often arbitrary,
social systems such as the law.
Sincerely,
Jason Coombs
jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html