[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] lame bitching about xpsp2
- To: "Raymond" <tukker@xxxxxxxxx>, "Nick Eoannidis" <nikon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] lame bitching about xpsp2
- From: "Jos Osborne" <Jos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:51:16 +0100
>Release candidates are not beta's. That's why beta's are called beta's
>and releasecandidates releasecandidates.
>
>Eventhough, beta's should already have a certain reliability, since
>beta means: ready for a scheduled releasetime. That is even more so
>for releasecandidates because (yes:) they are releasecandidates.
So they'd be Gamma's?
Jos
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html