Re: [Full-Disclosure] meta-question about the list

[Daniel Veditz <dveditz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Maarten wrote:

> I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a 
> "Reply-To: field with the list address there.  This makes replying a wee bit 
> more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster 
> instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses.
> 
> Is there a special reason this header isn't used ?

"-software"? I received this on full-disclosure. Which list would be put in
the Reply-to header?

See the articles

"Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful"
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

"Reply-To Munging Considered Useful"
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml

-Dan Veditz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html