[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-Disclosure] Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2
- From: it <fulldis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 09:13:52 +0200
Freitag, 13. August 2004 20:01 wrote devis:
> Beside, the unix based permissions system has proven far superior, ask
> apple. Still shameful that the default XP install, in 2004, at these
> malware times, still logs you as an administrator . Would you feel safe
> using ur *nix box as root everyday ? I wouldn't.
one big puzzle piece.
at this point I'm personally more interested what others think about Mac OSX
security history ranking among common OSs.
without using it or having any relationship to apple I've placed it no2 after
OBSD.
If that's ok it's an amazing example that even a desktop system with some
desktop market share (more than linux) can be effectively secure without
loosing functionality etc.
some comments?
thanks
i.t
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html