[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] AV Naming Convention
- To: "'Thomas Loch'" <thomas8142@xxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] AV Naming Convention
- From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:33:33 -0500
So if I change my name the police can't find me? ;)
AV companies should be able to work with any form of ID. Use their local
until an agreement as been made.
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Loch
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:09 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] AV Naming Convention
> This completely misses the point.
I do not completely agree ...
> When a new virus is discovered, it is
> essential that there is a RAPID response to the threat. ...
I agree...
> ...The idead of
> handing the critter over to a committee to decide it's name is, quite
> frankly, plain bonkers.
Why?
Why can't we handle not yet named viruses as 'unnamed' or we use a
standardized (by ISO?) method to generate a numeric code that consists of a
classification in categories and a sequential number and probably some kind
of checksum or hash until the virus gets an official name?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html