[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Linux kernel file offset pointer races
- To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Linux kernel file offset pointer races
- From: Pavel Kankovsky <peak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:07:38 +0200 (MET DST)
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> Furthermore, mtrr_read doesn't seem to exist anywhere in the Linux
> kernel, at least not by that name. The function in question would
> probably exist in linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/if.c, but there's
> nothing of the sort in there. Heck, the kernel code shown isn't even
> VALID.
The kernel code shown is from arch/i386/kernel/mtrr.c in 2.4. 2.6 is
different but the race between read()/write() and llseek() (or even
other read()/write() on the same fd (*)) is still possible. I don't know
whether it is exploitable on 2.6 but afaik it violates POSIX (see my post
to LKML: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.0/0925.html)
ergo it should be fixed.
(*) write()-write() race on the same inode using generic_file_write() is
not possible because they are serialized by inode->i_sem.
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html