On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 23:58, Eric Paynter wrote: > I'm a little confused by what you mean here. The "user:pwd@" prefix is a > part of the URI standard documented in the RFC. As far as I can tell, the > patently incorrect part is that they removed it and thus made the browser > (even more) lacking in standards support. It's a simple example of how MS > solves problems: I believe the issue was that there is no such thing as "user:pwd@" for http: or any other URI's with the exception of FTP: Just because it is described in an RFC for FTP doesn't mean that you can go ahead and add this capability to everything else that trails a colon. If you feel otherwise, please show us an RFC that describes "user:pwd@" for http:. Regards, Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part