[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] What about M$ in the shell: race
- To: <1@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] What about M$ in the shell: race
- From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:08:29 -0400
>>http://poc.homedns.org/execute.htm
>>http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/malware2k/installer.htm
I don't think of the Shell.Application exploit as the same thing as the shell:
link
exploit. Am I missing something?
>>shell:desktop
This really doesn't impress me. I don't see this as an attack at all, unless
you can
find a way to overflow the folder or something like that. Can you actually run
code this
way, as was easy to do with Mozilla with a simple shell:folder\\foo.exe?
Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer
larryseltzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html