Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines

[Nigel Stepp <stepp@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 rsh@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> To add to the 'Nobody trusts the OIS or its motives', I have to state
> that those NOT in the US object strenuously to anyone in the US
> unilaterally legislating anything that impacts a system used
> world-wide, when the 'safety' being legislated is to the benefit of
> the US over the rest of the world's concerns.  US court rulings in
> the area of the Internet, copyright, email privacy, and individual
> privacy rights tend to go against the views and rulings in the rest
> of the world, making us leery of any US centric legislation, much
> less unilateral laws on 'Internet Safety' or security.

I have to add that many IN the US feel the same way.

> R.S. (Bob) Heuman         -         Toronto, ON, Canada
> =======================================================
>         Independent Computer Security Consulting
>     Web Site Auditing for Compliance with Standards
> <rsh@xxxxxxxxxxx>        or        <rheuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>                     Copyright retained.
>                My opinions - no one else's...
>    If this is illegal where you are, do not read it!
>

-- 
:wq

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html