[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines
- To: OIS <announcements@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:36:23 +0200
> The Organization for Internet Safety (OIS) extends an invitation to
> the readers of the BugTraq, NTBugtraq, and Full-Disclosure mailing
> lists to participate in the ongoing public review of the OIS Security
> Vulnerability Reporting and Response Guidelines.
The definition of the term "security vulnerability" still does not
match current industry practice. Almost all COTS software lacks a
publicly reviewable design document, and popular software has not been
designed for Internet security *at* *all*. In a few cases, this is
even acknowledged by the vendor (think of Microsoft Windows Me or
Microsoft Windows NT).
In fact, I can't think of any recent, critical vulnerability that
matches your definition of a vulnerability.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html