Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack

[Denis Dimick <denis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Per the Free Software model it does.  The key point here is that Red Hat 
> is redistributing the code and making  a profit off of it.  It's Red 
> Hat's choice regarding whether to redistribute said code.  Since they're 
> making the money off of it, they have to support it.
> 

Sorry Barry but your wrong. If I burn a CD of a bunch of appliactions I 
get off the net and sell it, then by what your saying I should be 
supporting it? So then my ISP should support all the applications I get 
off the net since they take my money and give me net access?

> Sendmail and Bind have been riddled with bugs, this is true, but I don't 
> know if I'd label them some of the most buggy bits of code ever written.  :)
> 
> But, as you said, there are far better choices out there -- and Red Hat 
> (hypothetically speaking, of course) has the choice to distribute those 
> instead of sendmail/bind.

Have to agree with you here. To me some of the software that they have 
"bundled" into their CD's has been odd to say the least. 

I fear that RH will probally try to become like M$ in the linux world. 

Denis

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html