Re: [Full-Disclosure] Comparison of Network Security Scanners

[Christopher Blume <godsmoke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Exactly -- how can we trust a test where the company that conducted it, 
and therefor designed the test is the product that won.  Now, of the 
vendor tests I've seen conducted by a competitor, this one seemed pretty 
honest (Nessus scored very high).  However, they didn't test Retina 5 -- 
which from what I hear is supposed to be a very big improvement.  When I 
get ahold of it, I'd be happy to run some tests against Nessus.

Thank You,
Christopher Blume

Anders B Jansson wrote:

> And to everyones surprise their own product came out on top!
>
> Wow, it has to be good, film at 11
>
> // anders
>
> Alexander wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Comparison of Network Security Scanners:
> >
> > http://www.maxpatrol.com/pd_cmp2.asp
> >
> > In this survey the following products were tested:
> > 1    IS - Internet Scanner 7.0    Internet Security Systems
> > http://www.iss.net
> > 2    LG - LanGuard 3.2    GFI
> > http://www.gfi.com
> > 3    Ns - Nessus 2.0.6    Renaud Deraison<
> > http://www.nessus.org
> > 4    NR - NetRecon 3.6    Symantec
> > http://www.symantec.com
> > 5    Rt - Retina 4.9.97    eEye Digital Security
> > http://www.eeye.com
> > 6    MP - MaxPatrol 7.0    Positive Technologies
> > http://www.maxpatrol.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html