[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
- To: Cyril Guibourg <plonk-o-matic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
- From: B3r3n <B3r3n@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:26:18 +0200
At 10:29 30/06/2004, Cyril Guibourg wrote:
AFAIK, a PIX can operate without NAT. Did I miss something ?
Yes, NAT can be disabled on Pix.
See the 'nat' command.
Simply put the appropriate line syntax and it will behaves as a normal
Firewall.
But only behaves because no routing daemon, and Pix keeps managing packets
as a NAT box, he just does not change the source IP
Brgrds
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html