[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
- To: "Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
- From: Cyril Guibourg <plonk-o-matic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:17:36 +0200
"Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html