[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSH vs. TLS
- To: "Ng, Kenneth (US)" <kenng@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSH vs. TLS
- From: Gerhard den Hollander <gerhard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:29:23 +0200
* Ng, Kenneth (US) <kenng@xxxxxxxx> (Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:30:12PM -0500)
> Today this is a straw man arguement. You can tunnel practically anything
> over any protocol. I've seen NFS tunneled over EMAIL. Yes, when you type
> "ls" the NFS request packet gets UUENCODED into an email, sent over
> sendmail, fed into a decoder and routed back into NFS, and then back. A few
> seconds later and you get a directory listing. And frankly, I'm not sure
> you want to know what besides http really goes over port 80.
In fact, it's quite easy to tunnel ssh through your http(s) proxy
(do a google on proxytunnel) and it's most liekly that you can tunnel ssh
over a TLS telnet session, thiogh someone might have to be convinced that
writign such a thing is necesary ;) )
> : original poster:
>> - SSH allows tunneling other protocols, circumventing firewall policies.
Gerhard, (faliquid@xxxxxxxxx) == The Acoustic Motorbiker ==
--
__0 Oh my God, the bomb has just dropped
=`\<, And everybody climbed right on top
(=)/(=) Singing,"What a beautifull country
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html