[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?
- From: Mohit Muthanna <mohit.muthanna@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:18:24 -0400
like duh... have you _not_ heard of "edlin" ???
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, Stuart Fox (DSL AK)
<stuartf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > How about changing the ".exe" convention? Making a file
> > executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of
> > opportunities for problems, doesn't it?
> >
> > Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away.
> >
>
> No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
> create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
--
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
"There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't."
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html