Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ Getting Better?

[Nasir Ghaznavi <nasirghaznavi@xxxxxxxxx>]

Wow Wow Wow, why do we start fighting between each other whenever M$
is discussed, umm food for thought?

btw this time it may not be a microsoft product as i mentioned before,
they are just repackaging a product of another company(forgot its
name) that it bought sometime back.

So calm down everyone, its not microsoft after all :)

Nasir Ghaznavi

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:08:53 +0000, marklist@xxxxxxxxxxx
<marklist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This guy is the king of trolls... His resume shows no experience with any 
> flavor of unix, yet he feels compelled to come into a security ML and try to 
> convice people that MS products are the most secure products around.
> 
> I for one, DO have experience in both Windows and Unix system administration, 
> and everyone of our internet facing machines is running Linux.  Why?  Because 
> for me they are easier to secure.  I can turn off any services that I don't 
> need, I have a fully-functional firewall on every box, and I don't have to 
> reboot once a month to stay secure(all updates are currently automated, only 
> kernel vulns need a reboot).
> 
> Yes, you may be able to do most of that on a windows box, but probably not 
> without purchasing 3rd party software.
> 
> You are giving people a hard time for bashing Microsoft, but face it: this is 
> a security mailing list, and MS is not known for having a stellar history as 
> far as security goes.   You might as well call into Air America and start 
> pushing how great a person Ann Coulter is.
> 
> Wrong venue... Go vent at 
> microsoft.public.we.love.what.billy.tells.us.to.love.
> 
> -Shub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html