Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?

[Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx]

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, "Stuart Fox (DSL AK)" 
<StuartF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  said:

> No way!  Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
> create scripts and such at the command line?  Please tell me I'm not?

I think the intent is that "con as a special filename in every directory" has
to go away - you'd still be able to use

copy c:\something\con filename.txt

(Remember, us Unix people have had to use /dev/tty and /dev/null and /dev/zero
for 3 decades, and never minded that 'tty', 'null', and 'zero' didn't exist in
every single directory)....

Attachment: pgp00054.pgp
Description: PGP signature